View Single Post
Old 10-21-10 | 06:18 PM
  #17  
DMNHCAGrandPrix's Avatar
DMNHCAGrandPrix
Full Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 258
Likes: 100
From: Northern CA
I also found I needed lower gearing to get up and over the hills of the San Francisco peninsula. I tested a 1988 Chorus with both a 7 speed 13-32 IRD freewheel and a 6 speed Shimano megarange freewheel (14-34). The 6 speed Shimano freewheel shifted better than the IRD, gave a lower lowest gear, and was about 1/3 the price. Note that rear derailleurs from the early 1980s were not as good at maintaining a small constant chain gap between the freewheel and the jockey pulley as more recent derailleurs. Thus if you set up the derailleur to clear the largest rear cog on a wide range freewheel, there will usually be a pretty large vertical gap between freewheel and derailleur pulley when you shift to the smaller cogs. As a result, you will have to overshift the derailleur to get the chain to deflect enough to hop between cogs. On a 7 speed freewheel with narrow lateral spacing between adjacent cogs, this can create problems of jumping over adjacent gears. On a 6 speed freewheel with wider lateral spacing between cogs, the shifts often work better than with the narrow spaced 7 speed freewheel. Frank Berto recommends 7 speed freewheels only for corncob gearing on 80s bikes, but 6 speed freewheels with wider lateral space between cogs when you go to high tooth counts, lower gearing, and therefore larger chain gap between freewheel cog and derailleur.
DMNHCAGrandPrix is offline  
Reply