Old 11-10-10, 01:29 PM
  #7  
Doohickie
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,715

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
The other claim was that the driver got "preferential treatment" to avoid jail time due to his profession. Let me tell ya: There was a similar case here in Texas last year, only the cylcist was killed. He was a VP at a large corporation, was riding on the shoulder of a freeway access road. A ~20 year old driver came off the freeway and wandered a bit, going off onto the shoulder and taking the guy out. There were conflicting storeis about whether cell phone texting was involved. This driver was not charged at all. The driver was not a prominent person making millions, just a young driver. Not sure if that somehow makes this situation better or worse, just pointing out that the defendant's prominence and income were not THE reason charges were reduced; as Inertianinja said, this happens frequently.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline