View Single Post
Old 11-15-10 | 02:37 PM
  #29  
Doohickie's Avatar
Doohickie
You gonna eat that?
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,917
Likes: 543
From: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Originally Posted by tuxbailey
I don't think people are saying that he shouldn't ride. The question is whether he could afford to ride since he is a father of 5. If the goal is exercise, then riding a stationary bike or maybe even riding a hybrid in a park would achieve similar result. But as most in this forum know, riding a road bike at 20+ mph speed does have its own risks.

This is always an individual decision. It is different for someone with no dependents riding without insurance vs. someone who has a family depending on the income.
Actually, I did say he shouldn't ride, although that was basically the short version. There's lots of riding he could have done that was lower risk.

I ride for exercise. Most of my miles are on commuting to and from work. When I ride with a group, it's a loosely packed social ride. Given all that, I still ride fast, but not too fast for conditions. I slow down for corners or for water or leaves on the road, that sort of thing. There are still plenty of times I get the thrill of speed, and especially when I'm commuting, I am in a bit of a hurry to, especially homeward. But my primary goal is to ge through a ride in one piece. So I don't engage in risky maneuvers.

This guy who crashed- there's lots of riding he could have done that would have been far less risky than a tightly packed training ride. From the sounds of it, people from the OP's group go down pretty frequently. That's a foreseeable risk. If you don't have the resources to suffer the downside, avoid the risk.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Reply