Thread: ti vs al
View Single Post
Old 05-19-05 | 08:46 PM
  #6  
RiPHRaPH's Avatar
RiPHRaPH
Don't Believe the Hype
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
From: chicagoland area

Bikes: 1999 Steelman SR525, 2002 Lightspeed Ultimate, 1988 Trek 830, 2008 Scott Addict

Originally Posted by Trogon
I have a Moots Vamoots and a couple of high end aluminum bikes. At 105psi with a Fizik Pave saddle and similar wheels - they all ride the same. Does the fact that they're high end frames guarantee that they will ride better than your allez - who knows. You might find they're not worth the newly spent 5 grand.

Buy any high end bike in any material because you're looking for an excellent ride.

Buy a ti bike because you like the way they look.
i think what Trogon is saying above is true given a nicely paved surface. If your riding brings you on roads that are less than perfect then Ti beats Al in every single ride category (feel, comfort, life, power transfer) >> although high end Eddy Merkxx Al feels close to Lightspeed Ti.

The strength of good Ti frames lies in its welds and right amount of flex.

**weak: Ti has the 'soul' you are looking for. people love their Ti & CF & steel bikes. I've yet to find the unique love affair with Al that the owners of other materials boast about.
RiPHRaPH is offline  
Reply