Originally Posted by
myrridin
There is sufficient case law that says you can refuse the test, even in the implied state laws. The consequence is simply the loss of your drivers license, though even that is not a guarantee. You can challenge the loss in court and from a recent article I read you stand a very good chance of either reducing the length of time you loose the license or not loose it at all. Seems that most legislators take this option.
This is all if they don't have reasonable suspicion that you're drunk right? As I remember when I lived in Iowa they could require you to come take a blood test at a hospital, which people would opt for because it gave them about an hour to sober up and the cop had to be serious to spend his time doing that.