Old 11-18-10 | 07:40 PM
  #125  
learnmedia's Avatar
learnmedia
Go, Dog. Go!
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: SoCal

Bikes: '09 Fuji Team; '11 PedalForce QS3

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Correct.

I will not participate in a 'which is better' debate.

learnmedia, you might want to add to your argument that if Shimano seems slow to adapt it is not because of a lack of ability or ingenuity, it is because their product development cycle is longer than Campagnolo or, it seems, Sram. This is why I said that Ui2 may certainly already be cooked (certainly drawings exist - anyone check patents?) but what is at issue is whether or not it will be released for 2011.

As an aside, however, if we were to talk about the technical innovation of 11spd we would have to focus on the chain. According to the engineers at Campagnolo this was the biggest stumbling block and the key to the entire 11 spd drivetrain. No point here just something to consider; Not all innovations are readily apparent.

I am no longer in a position in the industry to know with any certainty what is or isn't being released for 2011 model year but with Eurobike and Interbike down , and no news, it only leaves 1 industry show and the Taipei bike show to drop the group for 2011. The industry show in 2 weeks seems the most likely of the two so if it doesn't happen there I doubt we'll see it in 2011.
Thanks for the reply. I wasn't actually looking to start a "which is better" debate either. More a "which company seems better positioned to continue to lead in the future" discussion. And whether producing an affordable, solid electronic shifting drivetrain will be a driving factor in which company happens to remain or become a market share and/or innovation leader.

I agree that 2011 seems waaay premature to see Ui2. I believe one of the rumor links I posted earlier mentions 2012, which seems more reasonable.

Last edited by learnmedia; 11-18-10 at 07:45 PM. Reason: typo
learnmedia is offline  
Reply