Originally Posted by
Rail
At its basic level, isn't the point of commuting by bicycle getting to work? The European or Asian model of bicycle commuting appears to be riding in your street clothes and then not having to shower on arrival or changing into a second set of clothing. It's transportation first, exercise incidentally.
If the bicycle is loaded up with unnecessary weight in the name of having a workout, then it's necessary to wear bicycle clothing and shower at work.
If bicycle commuting was perceived as being as simple as substituting the bicycle for the car instead of involving special gear and complex showering rituals, would it be more popular?
My bicycle is (enjoyable) transportation first and foremost. I do ride in my street clothes, the only bike specific clothing (as defined as being worn just because I am on the bike) I own is my helmet and my riding gloves.
Each person's idea of unnecessary is completely subjective. The items I carry, I feel are necessary--for whatever reason(s). It has nothing to do with having a workout, or strengh training. I have no need to train, I don't do any competitive riding (or anything else).
Like Adam DZ says "Commuting
is substituting the bicycle for the car." That is why I ride an Xtracycle, so that I can carry damn near anything that I feel a compelling need to carry.