Originally Posted by
JPMacG
I suspect that Brooks has some shills lurking here.
While I appreciate your coining of "Brooks police" to describe posters itching for this
saddle prattle to spark debate, there's no reason to assume Brooks is involved. I think people just like arguing about this stuff because of the heritage of the Brooks name and the reputation of their products. There seem to be many cyclists out there (immeasurably more experienced than myself) who agree Brooks saddles are
the best. I guess it seems logical, if not a waste of energy, to argue about
the best way to care for something so prestigious.