Old 12-03-10 | 05:03 AM
  #50  
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
Drew Eckhardt
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 326
From: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
you are too smart to fall for the linear speed vs. gravity thing
Right. The effects are less than linear since aerodynamic drag scales with the square of velocity.

Consider a 200 pound rider with the frontal area of a 5'11" professional cyclist riding on the brake hoods up a 3% grade. Doing a little rounding converting to metric numbers we get to 90 kg, 12 MPH, 5.3 meters per second, .400 meters^2 area, and Cd .760 per Gibertini and Grassi.

On OK clinchers and an asphalt road he'll take about 190W to maintain that pace.

An extra .9Kg (2 pounds) will drop his speed to 5.27 meters/second which is just .6%.

Of course on steeper, slower climbs the results will be closer to linear and just 1% (36 seconds in an hour) can still be more than enough to win or loose.

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 12-03-10 at 05:16 AM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Reply