Originally Posted by
The Weak Link
If Blackhawk wants to ban cyclists, I say good for them. Their interpretation of constitutional rights and privileges is as living and breathing as anyone else.
Unless and until a judge with the proper jurisdiction says it isn't.
Originally Posted by
The Weak Link
And anyone who tries to make the argument that "living and breathing" is just another meaning for "judicial usurpation" is itching for a fight and will be banned from watching Fox News for all Eternity.
Throw me into that briar patch, would you please? Oh wait, I'm already there... no need for a ban.
It's interesting to see the decisions being made by our current supreme court, under what is described as literal interpretation of the constitution. You can be an "activist judge" by going to extremes in either direction: "living and breathing", or "literal interpretation".