Old 12-03-10 | 09:59 PM
  #44  
Robert Foster
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 2
From: Southern california

Bikes: Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.

Originally Posted by Latitude65
Just a quick question, as if there is such a thing on the internet, about the law. It is a pretty well established practice for communities to ban cars, buses, etc from certain areas in towns and cities. Sometimes this is for congestion reasons and sometimes because they want the environment to change. If communities have the right to ban those types of vehicles why don't they have the right to ban another type of vehicle, the bicycle?

From what has been posted that seems to be the legal crux of the matter; does Blackhawk have the legal right to do what they did?

Whether that makes people who can't vote for the city council happy or not seems to be an ancilliary issue.

Any motive other than gathering information is the reader's inference, not the posters implication.
I presented this same question in an earlier forum debating this same issue. We do know of towns that have banned motor vehicles from parts of their town for any number of reasons. As a nation we have accepted this banning even if 98 or 99 percent of the people here drive. I know in my state Bicycles are banned from most freeways even if there are some exceptions when there are no other connecting roads between towns. You can’t even walk along side of most freeways unless you can prove it is an emergency or break down.
Is the issue that this is unusual or that it sets a bad precedent? It doesn’t mean I approve I am saying is it different from banning other kinds of vehicles from a town or village?
Robert Foster is offline  
Reply