Originally Posted by
BetweenRides
FNG:
The 500 has only been out a year - it's far from being obsolete. The 705 is actually closer to obsolescence with the intro of the 800. It all really depends on what you want from your cycling computer. the 500 is lighter weight, smaller and has superior UI to the 705/305 series. It picks up satellite signals faster and doesn't get as wonky under trees. The 705 offers maps but costs significantly more. So if you don't need maps, get the 500, if you do need maps, get the 705 or 800. I've used the 305 for years, had the 500 for close to a year and ride with several that use the 705 - all are good for their intended purposes. And to your question on the speed/cadence sensor - as socalrider mentioned - works great indoors on a trainer when gps isn't available. I use it all winter long.
$300 for the whole bundle on a 500 isn't a bad price at all, especially when you get Performance team points.
Thank you so much; your post was very helpful.
Great to know that the 500 is " up-to-date" and is fast at getting the signal and etc. Along with its light weightness and other features and given I don't care much for the maps especially when it implies on a bulky, heavy unit, I'm pretty convinced to get that bundle.
Thanks again.
By the way. I returned my travel track adjustable fluid trainer. Tried it for 5 minutes (of course that's not enough time to get used to it), but decided to just battle the cold. took it back and got some neoprene toesties. ehhehe.