View Single Post
Old 12-10-10, 01:24 PM
  #19  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,752 Times in 939 Posts
Geez, I should have known better than to mention weight in the C&V forum. Did I say under 20 pounds? No, I said around 20 pounds.
True enough and many people, perhaps me included, assumed that close includes under the twenty pound mark. That said, take another look at the weights of my vintage bicycles. How many do you see that tip the scale at less than 21 pounds? Or 22 pounds?

And, in defense of the weight weenies, it is thanks to them that we have seen the bicycle blossom, in part, into what it is today. A mechanical marvel that is constantly bombarded with creative people seeking ways to make the tool better. If lighter is better, so be it. And, as a retired millwright, or industrial mechanic, a light tool is much nicer to handle than a heavy one. Hour after hour, or, mile after mile.
randyjawa is offline