View Single Post
Old 12-23-10 | 12:17 PM
  #47  
jamesdak
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,394
Likes: 10,171
From: Utah

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Originally Posted by mcjimbosandwich
You are equating improvements to a wheelset with direct, measurable improvement in your speed, whereas improvements come in other ways, namely durability, ease of replacing damaged parts, etc.

I went from POS s!htmano 561 to a kinlin xr300 laced to white industry hubs with CX-ray spokes. The 561 goes out of true quite often, whereas the cx-ray only goes out of true when i really ding something (say a huge pothole at 28mph). Not to mention that it's hard to true the 561 b/c of the usage of internal nipples. As i said, the fact the kinlin front is about 120g light than the 561 is just icing.
You really need to slow down and read what I have written. I even agreed with you on the desired "improvement" qualities if you go back and look. Lightness was low or possibly not even mentioned when I emailed Rob for a quote. I certainly did not tell him I want them faster, LOL!! Like your last statement, I'll be going from a wheelset of around 2400+ grams to around 1600 grams, icing on the cake but it's the other attributes I asked for that matter to me. Oh and yes I do suspect they'll be faster accellerating and climbing. Not seeing where we disagree at all...
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.

Last edited by jamesdak; 12-23-10 at 01:24 PM.
jamesdak is online now  
Reply