View Single Post
Old 01-02-11, 10:04 AM
  #14  
jdon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Looigi
Perhaps we agree completely. That's why I mentioned the relative ages in the first place and credited some of the difference to design. I didn't mention manufacturing techniques because I don't believe any manufacturing techniques being used today by Ti frame builders weren't around 10 years ago, so the fact they may not have been used back then was a design/cost decision. I certainly believe that the best Ti bikes today are better than the best Ti bikes 10 years ago, and I believe they are plenty good enough, but are they better than the best carbon? I don't think so.

I'm a happy owner/rider of Ti and carbon bikes and enjoy each for its own charms.
Thanks for the clarification. We will just have to agree to agree.
jdon is offline