View Single Post
Old 01-03-11 | 04:47 PM
  #27  
Road Fan's Avatar
Road Fan
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,191
Likes: 757
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by DnvrFox
I'm REALLY glad you didn't say that. Otherwise, some of us might feel insulted, and we don't need yet another "war."

To me, part of the concern stems (at least I think so) from the "bean counters" in finances and industry to whom the ONLY God that they seem to worship is the "bottom line" - numbers. This - without any philosophical or other base of "right and wrong" or implications for society in the long run - or even the short run.

So, in the name of "numbers" (short-term profits) they have practically ruined our country.

Somewhere, we have to balance in some of those "arty" things - philosophy, concepts of "right and wrong" - family - love, etc.

I know this is carrying a discussion about quanitfying bicycle riding a little over the top, but there HAS to be more to it that how many miles one has gone, how fast, average speed, how many heart beats, etc., etc. At least there has to be more to it for ME. The beautiful suinrise, the family time at low speed and mileage, the herd of deer or the interesting and quaint buildings on a special route and many other "special" opportunities. Hey, folks, I believe these are important also.
Why can't we appreciate both? or count the bridges, flowers, eagles, and sunrises (and gophers, I guess, too.)? Wanting to be quantitative does not mean one doesn't appreciate the beauty. Really, to think so is to make unfair assumptions about others.

I won't make you count if you won't make me not count.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply