View Single Post
Old 01-08-11 | 09:46 AM
  #19  
Barrettscv's Avatar
Barrettscv
Have bike, will travel
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,286
Likes: 317
From: Lake Geneva, WI

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Originally Posted by bradtx
DaveSSS, I agree that a small-small usage shouldn't be used, but having a cross chaining princess daughter (nuff said there. ) the amount of RD wrapability needs testing, which I took for granted, but shouldn't have, as more damage can be done if the big-big is selected and the chain is too short than if the chain is too long and there's tension/guide wheel interferance.

Brad
I agree that the chain must be long enough to use the Big-Big combination without excess tension since this will damage and disable the drivetrain. If the range of the gears is larger than the real chain-wrap capacity of the RD (once the safety factor is removed), than allow slack as needed. A slack chain on the small-small combination will not cause damage and the only issue is a small risk of chain drop.

Michael
Barrettscv is offline  
Reply