Originally Posted by
electrik
FYI a touring bicycle isn't "slow", but then you got that information from craigslist... Those touring bicycles still have drops and you can get significantly aerodynamic for commuting. No, I wouldn't time-trial on it, but then i wouldn't time trial on a cross-check either. An 8" DH bicycle is overkill, but a touring frame is a great commuter and in terms of versatility it is one of the bests option because of all those eyelets and designed in features for carrying your loads.
Yes 26" LHT do have less of an option for skinny tires. Saying that, cross-checks probably won't fit studded 35s and fenders and the sharper head angle and short wheel-base will make it sketchy in the snow when compared to a more relaxed and longer framed bicycle like a LHT.
I would only get a cross-check if I could fit everything i needed into a back-pack because, after slapping 20lbs on the rack I really doubt one notices the extra 1.5lbs of steel used in the LHT frame, but they might notice how well a touring frame rides loaded compared to other frames.
I think either bike can make a great commuter, it all depends on what you're after. I do see Cross-checks all the time in the winter and one of my coworkers has one set up with rack, panniers, 35mm studds and fenders. Maybe the LHT would make a better winter bike, -don't know. As far as riding with loads is concerned, last year I put a rack and panniers on what is essentially a low end racing bike. With 15 to 20 lbs. stability and handling weren't a problem but panniers did sap most of the fun out of that bike.
In our garage is a Univega sport touring bike from the 80's. No cantis, but it does have long chain stays. It's a very smooth riding bike but it does take a little bit more to get it up to speed and keep it there. It's a great bike for a long semi-leisurely ride. But if I'm in a hurry? It wouldn't be my first choice. Like I said, it depends on what you're looking for.