I read the whole thing earlier today. It reads like a man trying to fill holes in a story. There's portions where he can seemingly remember minute details about conversations going back into the 90's but fails to remember pretty hefty details of only a few years ago even going as far to admit that he might have ran a few conversations between people together. I'm not saying he's lying, but he does make it hard to believe he's getting his own facts straight.

He talks quite a bit about "that's not how I was raised", "I couldn't lie to my parents", "When I say I'll do something, I'll do it", etc. It struck me as odd he kept driving those points in this interview. Almost as if he's trying to convince himself of something that we wants so desperately to believe.

I also found it suspect that Landis claims that within a few days of meeting LA and joining the team he's riding in speeding cars and basically thrust into the doping lifestyle of LA and his teammates. Call me crazy, but I find it hard to believe anyone would be that careless with so much at stake. If LA is (was) doping, I doubt more than a handful of other people know about it.

I don't know if LA doped, but reading this doesn't make me believe that he did any more than I did yesterday. Do I think there is doping in the peloton, yes, did this make me believe there some sort of large conspiracy and Landis is the scapegoat, no.

The interview is being billed as the "OMG here's our proof" interview. I'm just not buying it yet.

Also, he complains about not being invited to join any ProTour teams this year. After pretty much naming every relevant rider in the last 10 years a doper what does he expect?