View Single Post
Old 02-03-11 | 02:29 PM
  #893  
alpha_bravo's Avatar
alpha_bravo
Mr. Sparkle
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 534
Likes: 6
From: Sugar Land, TX

Bikes: 08 Specialized Allez Elite

Originally Posted by 2ndGen
I think that just as important as weight is balance.
A well balanced bike makes up for a little extra weight.
Me? 15lbs is a target weight because I'd like to work from the same
standards that the pros work from as some sort of reference point.
Just out of curiosity, why is balance important? This is the first time I've ever even heard it brought up. You don't ride a bike balanced on a finger, a bike has two contact points on the ground and a much heavier object (the rider) positioned on top of the bike which will dramatically alter the center of gravity and balance you've sought. Hell, pros even stick metal rods in their top tubes to make UCI weight regulations, so I'm curious as to why you place such importance in it?

Either way, until you're on the slopes of Ventoux or Mount Evans, weight of the bicycle has little effect. I made a big change on my CAAD going from the stock Shimano wheels to Eason EA90's. The drop in weight was about .5 pound, probably more considering I changed to GP4000 tires as well. I don't feel jack difference, even when climbing. What I do feel a difference from is bumping up my riding mileage and lengths of rides.

I think many who have posted in this thread would agree the weight obsession and tinkering is a hobby in itself as much as cycling which is cool, but as others have mentioned, let's try to keep things in perspective when extolling the virtues of 60 gram differences (about .14 pounds) in cranksets and brake sets.
alpha_bravo is offline  
Reply