Old 06-02-05 | 10:42 AM
  #11  
JavaMan's Avatar
JavaMan
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
From: Southern California

Bikes: 2013 KHS Flite 747

Originally Posted by 531Aussie
CAAARMON!! Nobody says that anymore.

I would say this is the current "doctrine":


"Popular Guides" http://www.bsn.com/Cycling/cranks.html

..Height......Inseam.....Crank length
under 5'.....<=70 cm.....165
5' to 5'2"....<=74 cm.....167.5
5'2" to 5'7".<=80 cm....170
5'7" to 6'....<=86 cm......172.5
6' to 6'5"....<=93 cm......175
over 6'5"....<=99 cm......177.5 - 180.0
But they ARE saying it, and your chart proves it. 165 is only 3% smaller than 170, and 175 is only 3% larger than 170. I see the doctrine as "170 mm (give or take a tiny variation) is right for everyone."
JavaMan is offline  
Reply