Originally Posted by
cinco
Hopefully I'll be able to raise the question without starting a fight, but...
I just don't get the whole new-parts-on-an-old(style)-frame thing. I don't think they look particularly good, they only make life easier if you don't maintain your own equipment, and if you wanted your life to be "easier" in the first place you'd drive a car. Plus, Eddy didn't need brifters and he was faster than I am. I guess it just doesn't make sense to me to take an old (style) bike and try to turn it into a new bike, and if manufacturers are trying to trade on the popularity of old bikes why are they putting modern parts on 'em? If I want an old bike, I'll buy an old bike; if I want a new one, I'll buy a new one. It may be that I'm lacking some sort of perspective as a person who only rides for fun, fitness, and historical appreciation and who has never worn spandex in his life, but I'm at a loss. Again, I'm not trying to offend or start a fight but can someone explain the appeal of such things to me?
Point well taken.
Among other reasons I think there is a hot-rodding aspect to these modifications. The idea of customizing an old frame with modern components is like having a blast from the past with modern technology. <As I type this I'm not sure if I am making sense (: The same thing goes in the automobile world. People take classic cars from the 50's or 60's and install modern engines, wheels, and drive-trains and voila they are cruising in classic style with modern comforts and power.
I will now go to the default reason: Everyone's perceptions and likings are different and to each his own.