Old 02-15-11, 09:15 AM
  #1  
Flash
Are you with me
 
Flash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 1,311

Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced SL, Blue T-14 TT bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Leipheimer TT position or Cancellara TT position: which is better?

As the season approaches I realize I can close up the gap in my TT position so it resembles more of a Leipheimer position than that of Tony Martin or Cancellara. I included a photo of Millar b/c he's sort of in-between. For me, it's just a question of going with up-turned aerobars and I can get close to the Leipheimer position without any loss of comfort.

I'm making the assumption that the "closed" Leipheimer position produces a better aerodynamic profile -- e.g. the wind encounters a single mass and glides around it. The Martin/Cancellara position seems to invite the wind in between the arms where it bounces off the rider's quads and mid-section. The only way I can test is via downhill coast and I will try this soon. If the Leipheimer position is superior, why don't riders like Martin and Cancellara close the gap more? I realize Cancellara would win most TTs on a huffy mtb, but still, why not work on the position?

Thanks

Leipheimer closed gap:




David Millar medium sized gap reduced with upturned aerobars:



Tony Martin big gap:




Cancellara big gap:

Flash is offline