Originally Posted by
HillRider
I get 30,000 miles and more on a set of Shimano chainrings so it's not as if they are being replaced every six months. Then too, do steel rings actually last that much longer?
So here's something about Shimano chainrings that I am wondering. My bikes have generally had either ulegra rings or whatever rings came with my Truvativ cranks. My wife has 105 cranks/rings. When cleaning rings, I often noticed that the dirt was harder to get off my wife's rings -- usually needed at least water to get em clean whereas I could wipe most dirt off my rings with a dry rag. Recently I needed to replace one of my truvativ rings and found a cheap 105 53t ring, so I used that. Same deal, takes a bit effort to get dirt off the 105 rings as compared to the ultegra and truvative rings I use/used. So what explains my experience. Are 105 rings coated or not coated with something that makes em stickier? If it matters, 105 rings are a different color (light silver) than Ultegra 6500 rings (more of a flat gray).