What makes this argument pointless is that most people disagree based on their righteousness of choice rather than scientifically sound evidence. It is unfortunate that our educational system cannot do better and the simplest laws of physics and logic can be overwhelming, whether you sell bicycles or perform surgeries. Cathexis is a major part of our society and when faced with dissent, many immediately assume they are being subjugated and controlled. This discussion was not in any way meant to tell anyone what must and must not be done. It was rather an attempt at a scientific explanation for a phenomenon. As human being, we should all have a choice to wear or not to wear a helmet. That's irrelevant to this discussion. I would in fact advocate that as long as the society is not forced to pay the medical costs, every human being should have the right to do whatever he or she pleases with his body, including not wearing seatbelts, abortion, suicide, or drugs. Natural selection is the driving force of the world and it will make our world a better place.
As for helmets, just like every other device and medication in the world, no one can deny that there can be some protracted circumstances where helmets might cause harm. Even airbags and water have side effects. It is up to the individual to understand the evidence and decide whether a possible, likely negligible side-effect is not worth the overall outcome.
Currently there is enough evidence in this thread for the shrewd observer to come to his or her conclusion. It is a mathematical fact that no matter the cause, there will always be some percentage of the fringe that will dissent. But that does not detract from the larger purpose of this discussion the goal here already been achieved. Good luck and may the force be within you
.