View Single Post
Old 03-09-11 | 04:07 PM
  #45  
thebulls
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 4

Bikes: SOMA Grand Randonneur, Gunnar Sport converted to 650B, Rivendell Rambouillet, '82 Trek 728, '84 Trek 610, '85 Trek 500, C'Dale F600, Burley Duet, Lotus Legend

Originally Posted by RunningPirate
Fair enough, but can you explain why? Is it a weight issue? Components are not as good? Frame material? Geometry? I ask because I'm going to be riding my first brevet ever (Moss Beach 200K) on Saturday on refurbished vintage (c1970) "lite touring" bike. Granted, she's a bit heavy, but has some nice low gearing for the hills.
If you're talking about the Dawes Galaxy, I think it should be fine as long as the components are reliable enough and the frame is sound. Lots of randonneurs are happy to ride Rivendell lugged frames, and there is basically little difference between the materials used in those frames and the materials used in something like a Dawes Galaxy (Reynolds 531, if I recall). The Dawes' geometry should work nicely for randonneuring.

Right now, my primary brevet bike is an '84 Trek 610 (Reynolds 531CS) that is probably very similar to the Dawes--it has a mix of used and new components, all reliable. My "best" brevet bike is a Gunnar Sport, which differs primarily because it uses newer, higher-tech, thinner-walled, lighter steel tubing. The small weight savings is all but cancelled by the S&S Couplers, but I still like the way the Gunnar feels a little bit better, particularly for climbing. But for regular brevet use, I ride the Trek, because it's got all middle-quality components that cost less to replace when they wear out. The Trek feels very much like my Rivendell Rambouillet, which may go up for sale to help finance PBP if I can bear to part with it.
thebulls is offline