Old 03-11-11, 08:04 AM
  #83  
Hydrated
Reeks of aged cotton duck
 
Hydrated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Middle Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,176

Bikes: 2008 Kogswell PR mkII, 1976 Raleigh Professional, 1996 Serotta Atlanta, 1984 Trek 520, 1979 Raleigh Comp GS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
hydrated, I take your word for it, but it does seem that car tires and bike tires have different needs because of the way the bike sways deliberately through turns. Cars do their best not to sway through turns.
Oh yes... you are abso-tively correct.

But you never said that we wanted to look at the dynamics of cornering and directional change on the tire. I was only looking at the physics that affect rolling resistance and cruising effort. Car tires work differently from motorcycle tires (and their little cousins... bicycle tires) in the way that they corner and steer the vehicle.

But the physics of sidewall deflection, contact patch variables, and rolling resistance still hold true for every pneumatic tire on the planet.
Hydrated is offline