View Single Post
Old 03-13-11 | 12:54 AM
  #19  
vandalarchitect's Avatar
vandalarchitect
Vandalized since 2002
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 632
Likes: 15
From: Issaquah, WA
Originally Posted by Raptor1956
There is science and engineering here and a look at the airline industry is revealing as $B's are at stake. What they do is throttle up into the wind so that they are negatively effected for less time. When they have a tail wind they ease up of the throttles so that the wind can benefit them for more time.

In the USA, when flying west-to-east they have a tail wind that can be 200 miles per hour but is usually about 100mph. When they fly east-to-west they face that same wind in the face. If they did not increase the throttles into the wind and decrease with it the flight time difference would average 50% (500+100 versus 500-100) but could be more than 100% (500+200 versus 500-200). But, that's not what happens as the difference is typically less than 20%.

So, the scientific answer is to pedal harder and reduce the drag by getting into the drops when you ride into the wind and you can pedal easier with a tail wind. Again, you want to reduce the time spent fighting the wind so you MUST ride harder.


Brian
Are you an airline pilot? Cause I am and I can tell you that what you're saying is...well...not true.
Not to mention it has no real application to bicycling. How many times do you sit down to crunch some numbers on your caloric intake and the cost of 'fuel' when you're contemplating whether to push it and suffer or just make it through a headwind?

Last edited by vandalarchitect; 03-13-11 at 12:55 AM. Reason: double typo
vandalarchitect is offline  
Reply