View Single Post
Old 03-13-11 | 06:46 PM
  #27  
mtnbke
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 7
From: Boulder County, CO

Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.

Originally Posted by Murf524
Is anyone else excited about the electronic shifting?
I'm not particularly interested in it for my single but it sure would simply shifting issues on my tandem. In theory once you have it set you're good to go - none of that pesky cable stretch.
If I had a coupled bike I'd only need one cable splitter for the rear brake while the derailleurs would be wiring connectors. Am I living a pipe dream?
I was really excited when it first came out as Mavic Zap, and then later kind of excited for Mavic Mektronik. I'm not impressed with the Shimanoculture attempt.

I don't think I'd ever consider anything electronic for the tandems. The rear derailleur would just be too application specific and not offer anything close to the wide range and long cage rear that our applications require. Though, I don't see why a dedicated flatland tandem racing team couldn't effectively use one.

To me its just one more thing to go wrong on the bike. We don't get to ride the tandem enough. The last thing I'd want to hang on the bike is a higher zoot part that only introduces another fail point that could potentially ruin a ride and leave us stranded. Remember, a tandem, captain and stoker can't exactly hitch a ride with well meaning cyclists driving subcompacts!
mtnbke is offline  
Reply