View Single Post
Old 03-20-11, 09:00 PM
  #10  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,723

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5790 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times in 1,431 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
That extra link on a system that is setup to max capcity of the rear derailleur means that it will be slack in the small/small combo. I've seen this before.

I guess you can tailor it to the application, but why bother calculating whether its at capacity or not. Big/Big eliminates any and all confusion.

Also, going back to the above. Setting the chain length with the derailleur pependicular method allows you to set a too short chain length if the derailleur does not have enough capacity. Big/Big + 2 eliminates this problem. It is always reliable, regardless.
Nothing is wrong with what you say, but if you read my earlier post, I described minimum, maximum and in between chain lengths. Any length that is longer than the minimum, and shorter than maximum is OK.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline