Originally Posted by
closetbiker
the article talks about being "ensnared by cars" and being, "in a society so saturated with cars" so talking about the application of bicycles in these conditions as being more efficient and swift in comparison seems fair. It's not talking about Kansas.
Who said anything about Kansas? The author was talking about Sydney, Australia, which has a population of about 4.5 million. It's a big city. The official city limits encompass almost 4700 square miles.
Even assuming that that it's a perfect square, that would make it 68 miles across -- so four or five hours to ride a bike from end to end under good conditions? You can probably do that in a car in a little over one hour.
When people talk about bicycles being "efficient" -- they're rarely talking about their "swiftness" at the same time. (Bikes are so efficient compared to cars in a joules per mile*pound way
because they go slow.) They will get you there in some situations faster -- in very highly congested areas, short distances, places where parking is impossible to find -- but outside of that niche, a car will get you there faster. And I've never been there, but I'll bet cars are faster in most of Sydney for a trip of more than a mile or two.