Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Indeed I do write this because it is clear to anyone not wired into the group speak clique of the zealous EC "We's"; and indeed Daily Commute's auto-response is to typically whine and offer loopy critiques about writing style rather than offer substance to his "thoery(ies)".
Sorry, but such responses don't add any substance or validation to your "thoery" about cycling conditions or "thoery" about relevant cyclist concerns in locations of which you are obviously ignorant except for unique interpretations and extreme worrywart legal predictions derived from cutting and pasting of Internet snippets.
Ooooooh. You discovered a type-o. Congratulations. You are a class act, almost as classy as Forester. But, alas, he still he manages to be a little more polite and respectful in the way he argues.
As to substance, I've had plenty of substantive discussions/arguments with Genec and others in this thread. They make points that merit responses. We often end up mostly agreeing. Some comments are not worthy of substantive responses, so I don't bother.