Originally Posted by
The Human Car
This is not Chainguard, the necessity for being anti-bikeways is not a given here and as far as I am concerned you have failed to make any semblance of a rational argument toward that point here as it always seems to breakdown to ad hominem attacks, just as you have done here with Genec.
In regards to your statement in bold, please look in the mirror, the call for credibility and rationality is my point as well. If you have a problem with an equally crass counter-argument that proves that you have failed to provide any facts what so ever, then don't start down that road.
Mr. Forester has demonstrated for many years that he has a serious problem with any argument, study, opinion or discussion (crass or polite) that does accept his view as the
one and only correct and indisputable argument, study, opinion or discussion on any bicycling topic.
As you infer, Forester is satisfied and comfortable only with
Chainguard Brand discussions where the moderator/list owner assures that all commentary toes the Forester line on bicycling advocacy and safety issues. For Forester and his strident vehicular cyclist acolytes, all other arguments are treated as not credible and generated from thought patterns of irrational incompetents and mental defectives with phobic delusions.