Originally Posted by
The Human Car
This is not Chainguard, the necessity for being anti-bikeways is not a given here and as far as I am concerned you have failed to make any semblance of a rational argument toward that point here as it always seems to breakdown to ad hominem attacks, just as you have done here with Genec.
In regards to your statement in bold, please look in the mirror, the call for credibility and rationality is my point as well. If you have a problem with an equally crass counter-argument that proves that you have failed to provide any facts what so ever, then don't start down that road.
The facts of the matter are that Genec provided the totally insufficient argument that since we spend space on arterial roads then bikeways are justified because we could use that space for bikeways. I responded by stating the obvious, that simple solutions to complex issues are the sign of simplistic thought. Then Human Car responded describing me as of deranged mind and a bullying personality, and added that I had provided no evidence for my statement. My statements about the arguments are obvious on their face; Genec's was simplistic, Human Car's added nastiness. The only other item of evidence needed is that the bikeways issue is complex, which is not something that anyone seriously doubts.