View Single Post
Old 04-03-11 | 06:22 PM
  #19  
northerntier
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by twobadfish
But there really isn't any comparison between the two. A phone as a cycling computer is a cheap interim solution. But for a long term solution, and especially for long rides, it's really not that practical. No animosity there. Just honest analysis.
Don't knock what you haven't tried. Burning 75% in 2.5 hours would be with the map on. Turn the map off and you can go all day. Or, buy a $30 battery backup and leave the map on for long rides. Or use a generator hub, which many of us have.

As far as the software, there are many different choices. The bike-specific ones tend not to have maps, though MotionX allows you to pre-cache entire swathes of map, as one poster noted above.

For me, the iphone is the long-term solution, and cost is not a factor. The flexibility, the variety of different apps, the pace at which they are being improved, all leave garmin in the dust. On the other hand, I no longer use cadence or heart rate.

Different strokes.
northerntier is offline  
Reply