Hello all,

Ok, I've been looking at the specs, geometry, etc of these Motobecane cyclocross bikes. Components seem to be top notch for the price, but I'm not finding too many reviews.

What I have been hearing (and reading) are a lot of rave reviews about the Kona cross series, but the Motobecanes just seem technically better (from my newbie-perspective).

I'm supposed to test-ride a Kona Jake this weekend, but I haven't been able to find a Moto to test out.

So, questions are: Is there a general consensus on the Motos?
&
Motos vs Konas, all components considered equal (even though the Motos are almost half the price despite more expensive components), which bikes are considered "better" and why?

I will be using this as my commuter btw, in the crag-filled streets of NYC. I also understand that I have to try them out first to make a decision for myself, but in the meantime outside wisdoms and considerations are appreciated.

Thanks guys.