View Single Post
Old 04-17-11 | 08:27 AM
  #214  
thook's Avatar
thook
(rhymes with spook)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 749
From: Winslow, AR

Bikes: '83 univega gran turismo x2, '85 schwinn super le tour,'89 miyata triple cross, '91 GT tequesta, '90 yokota grizzly peak, '94 GT backwoods, '95'ish scott tampico, '98 bonty privateer, '93 mongoose crossway 625, '98 parkpre ariel, 2k'ish giant fcr3

No one's posted here in a couple of months, so after reading a bunch of this thread, I figure I'd revive it a bit.....

Got a question for you pro's........

I have a Trek 614, '82 model, and a buddy of mine and I are seriously considering a romp down the Katy Trail sometime this year after the summer heat has passed. Well, I have my choice of using this ride or a mountain bike of double butted cro-mo/no suspension. It's around a '90 model/Giant "Boulder". Anyway, by far the Trek is more comfortable, but which one would be better able to handle a load on the front and rear and what would be a good weight limit? I weigh in at 180lb's currently, though that extra 20lb's or so is in the process of leaving. So, come time, I'll be lighter. I looked up the weight limits on vintage Trek's website, but not knowing much about these things, I wonder how accurate that estimation is or if it's conservative/what have you. I'd personally love it if the Trek's suitable. It's my favorite ride. I did experiment with a load of approx. 20lbs on the front rack and was surprised to know how stable the steering was, but I don't want to over stress the frame, you know?

Any input would be dandy. Thank you!
thook is offline  
Reply