View Single Post
Old 04-18-11 | 07:32 PM
  #15  
clink83
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by striknein
Threadless forks were designed to make it easier for bicycle manufacturers to mass-produce one fork for many different sized bikes. There is no benefit to the rider between the two.[EDIT]: My previous statement isn't entirely true. Better threadless headsets use cartridge bearings, and I'm not aware of a cartridge bearing replacement for a threaded headset. Tradeoffs abound here, as cartridge bearings are typically replaced, while loose ball bearings or bearings in retainers can be serviced and reused several times. However, cartridge bearings usually go longer without needing service.
Wrong. Threadless headsets are lighter, stiffer, easier to change forks with, easier to adjust, easier to service, and don't get stuck due to sweat corrosion. The stems are easier to remove handlebars from, easier to change, and cheaper to replace. Aside from asthetics, threadless is superior.
clink83 is offline  
Reply