Originally Posted by woodboy
Must've been a miniature Dingo with a topknot. But seriously, potentially vicious dogs and guns are both legal but require responsibity on the part of their handlers. The problem is that people refuse to take responsibility for them. In a society, for better or worse, instiutions take over when individual refuse their responsibilities.
Another dichotomy regarding the tired firearm versus Pit Bull debate? Though I don't own a gun personally, I believe in the right to bare arms however do not believe Pit Bulls should be owned as pets.
The joke or premise is the forever stated..."accepting responsibility" for Pit Bull ownership. One could make the argument that responsibility and Pit Bull ownership is mutually exclusive though that would be unfair to those responsible Pit Bull owners which do clearly exist. It isn't about them. The world is full of irresponsible people and an even smaller subset...those that own Pit Bulls. In that event...society has a problem. A better argument over and above Pit Bull ownership in the vane of gun ownership...is the right to own an assault rifle...lol. A Pit Bull is the assault rifle of dogs.
George