Originally Posted by
max5480
It is unfortunate that my life, as I'm sure many of yours, is spent a great deal browsing bicycles and parts, completely absorbed in the capitalistic powers of the cycling industry. Too much money is spent on the newest, lightest, fastest bicycle; money that could be going to a more worthy cause.
But though it doesn't completely justify this overindulgence, I think fixed gears bicycles are the far end of the consumerist spectrum. At a base level, there are simply less parts and, theoretically, less money spent. Also, there is a huge interest in steel bikes, which are traditional, cheaper, and put comfort and practicality ahead of speed. It's also cool that most people's non-ss/fg bikes are old steel road bikes.
Anyway, I guess I'm trying to say that we spend a lot of money on bikes, but because they are minimal and have a clean aesthetic they start to blur the boundary between consumerism and art, which to me, makes all the difference.
"capitalistic powers of the cycling industry"
lolwut?
There is no major capitalistic power in the cycling industry. Name one person (non-athlete) of the Bicycle Industrial Complex that is a Billionaire. Millionaire? Ok, there has to be a few Thousandaires...right?
It's a bike, not a statement against consumerism. It's your fault that you feel guilty about spending money. Excuse me, *thinking* about spending money.
The same Taiwanese worker that built your Kilo TT also built Andy Schleck's Trek.
http://allanti.com/articles/where-wa...made-pg328.htm