View Single Post
Old 05-15-11 | 05:51 PM
  #18  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

My 1948 Raleigh Record Ace has round section fork blades, and it's definitely a road bike. I haven't noticed any abnormalities in the handling.

I understand why round blades would be stiffer side-to-side while D or elliptical blades would be stronger front-to-back, but I really doubt it would make any difference to someone of my weight, and I am disinclined to think it would make a difference to anyone. Bicycle designers and theoreticians often get an idea about something or other and proceed to base all their designs around it, without ever really testing them properly. Whether this is such a case, I don't know; but it sure wouldn't surprise me if it is.

As I recall, that Kolin/De la Rosa book is full of statements like "Signor such-and-such believes blah-blah-blah and therefore designs all his bicycles to conform with this principle."

Last edited by rhm; 05-15-11 at 05:54 PM.
rhm is offline  
Reply