Originally Posted by
Kerlenbach
When you get a subpoena, you get "use immunity" meaning that nothing you say can be used against you unless you lie (talk to Barry Bonds about that). You can still be prosecuted, but the feds would have to show that everything they used came from a source other than the immunized testimony. That's how Oliver North skated during Ronald Reagan's Iran-Contra scandal - he testified to Congress under a subpoena, and then the feds couldn't show that their evidence against him was untainted. Testifying under a subpoena removes the fifth amendment claim.
uhm, you don't get the use immunity, unless they offer it to you. And then you get into issues of use immunity versus transactional immunity.
Simply testifying under a subpeona doesn't resolve the 5th amendment issue.
If I'm subpoenaed to the Grand Jury, I'm holding out for complete immunity, and threatening to go Anderson on them till I get complete immunity.