Originally Posted by
Campag4life
Rather the point is, there are two standards not one. Perhaps in your ideal world there should be only one grade. Context and money changes things. Ted Kennedy comes to mind. Few can leave the scene of a crime with a young women drowning because of your mistake of being drunk and behind the wheel and then have a career in congress. It is done all the time and doping is dominant in sports and superstars do get a pass. Will talent, influence, money and yes contribution always get a free pass? More times than not. Because at the end of the day, guilt is generally considered with context and not absolutes.
And so what?
There is a big difference between saying "sometimes, the rich and famous get free" and saying "Lance *should* get special treatment b/c he is rich and famous".