Old 05-30-11 | 08:54 AM
  #38  
gregf83
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 289
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by twobadfish
If you are so adamant about proving that Garmin+proper HR monitor = horribly inaccurate why don't you actually post some definitive information about it? I have, and it has shown that the two different heart rate monitors Garmin manufactures produce different results with deviations of 10% on the newest premium HRM and up to 35% on the older HRM.
To be clear, you posted a chart written by Firstbeat (the company providing the algorithms for calculating energy expenditure). It is an older chart and the row you highlighted refers to beat by beat HR recording. Garmin heart straps don't support this as far as I know they just supply the HR level once every second.

There's no doubt that the Garmin 500 has an improved calorie estimate and it works reasonably well for some people but it is not within 10% accuracy for the everyone and produces fairly large errors for some people.
gregf83 is offline  
Reply