Originally Posted by
genec
It's not what "the government says," as the government clearly endorses cyclists use of the roadways by the laws of the land... it is what actually gets enforced that speaks the loudest... and in that regard, the responses are all over the place... from cyclists being told to get off the street (by LEOs in cars) to the Texas case of a cyclist spending time in jail for wanting to ride in the travel lane, to even the San Diego case where a cyclist was trying to pass stopped autos and ended up having to go to court to fight for his 21202 rights.
The distributed literature does not seem to get to the masses or the folks doing the enforcement. Cyclists see it, we discuss it, and that is as far as it goes.
The San Diego cyclist did not go to court "to fight for his 21202 rights." He went to court to fight for his rights that law enforcement believed had been taken from him by 21202. Without 21202, none of the above would have occurred. 21202 takes away rights, and then appears to give some back, which most people find it difficult to understand.