Old 06-06-11, 01:39 PM
  #44  
tagaproject6
Senior Member
 
tagaproject6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550

Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 278 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
The problem is you don't understand where the danger is coming from. The vast majority of collisions involving cars and bikes occur at intersections.

A very small percentage involve cars traveling the same direction as the bike.

Thus, while it's possible that riding on the sidewalk would reduce the risk of being hit from behind, it greatly increases the risk of being hit at an intersection (because you're not where the cars expect you, you're coming the wrong direction, your visibility is worse etc.)

So on balance, minor reduction of a small risk (rear end) with major increase of a big risk (intersection collision) makes your risk much higher on the sidewalk.

Don't let your irrational fears lead you a bad conclusion. Rather, look at the statistics for yourself, and listen to the combined wisdom of people who have ridden a lot more than you, and bicycle safety advocates who have given it a lot more thought and research.
But...but...it is far easier to convince a blind man to see than for someone pretending to be blind.
tagaproject6 is offline