Originally Posted by
Keith99
Yours is the only reply I noticed that says drafting is not an all or none thing. One is still getting significant benefits 2 or 3 lengths back.
According to the following, it drops off rapidly as you go to 2 bike lengths. At 3 bike lengths is not significantly better than the extrapolated benefit at 6 bike lengths.
http://ironman.com/mediacenter/press...#axzz1P5VwwK3E
After evaluating the data, the team determined that under perfect testing conditions, the drafting benefit decreases rapidly as the drafting distance increases up to 5.8 meters (2 bike lengths). At drafting distances greater than 5.8 meters, the drafting benefit continues to drop, but at a greatly reduced rate. Although the engineers were not able to test for distances greater than 7.7 meters, extrapolating the data suggests that a rider trailing at six lengths would have similar draft force to a rider that's trailing at a three-length distance. What does that mean? Ironman's three bike-length rule remains intact.
Originally Posted by
Burton
For drafting to be effective the distances are measured in inches - not feet.
People can get benefits without being as close as "inches" and without the level of risk and required-attention that "inches" requires.
http://www.kirunahasse.se/luleackold...d/brekaway.pdf
Looking at the V0max curve in figure 1, the effort (smaller numbers indicate less effort) at
0.0 meters is 0.69
0.5 meters is 0.70
1.0 meters is 0.72
2.0 meters is 0.82
3.0 meters is 1.00 (close to no benefit at all).