Originally Posted by
Bekologist
john said he'd made his offer clear on some SD bike advocacy site. That is neither here nor there, however.
This thread is about FRAP case laws.
Regarding FRAP case laws, it does sound like there has been a miscarriage of justice in San Diego county with a failure of lower courts to abide by appellate court rulings regarding bicyclists use of substandard width lanes; These recent convictions are sure to be rescinded if justice is not blinded by the polluted haze southern californians live under..
I think that substand width of lane was not the issue in this case; it certainly did not appear so from the photos presented. The problem was that 21202 existed at all, because it was the existence of 21202 that enabled the cop to bring a charge. Without 21202, he would have had no basis for charging.