View Single Post
Old 06-30-11, 12:45 PM
  #21  
dynodonn 
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by AltheCyclist
The way I understand it, the US Gov't did the exact opposite of what is discussed above.
I.e. back in the 1970s, when passenger cars became emissions-regulated, the US conceded to auto-makers that "light-trucks" would be exempt from the smog laws (for a period).
As any good marketers would, carmakers then began to increase marketing of the SUV (which are technically and basically light trucks) vehicles (since they became more profitable without the added emissions control costs) to boost sales. And viola, the SUV boom began.
Fast forward to today and the discussion leads to gov't regulating SUVs (by CDL, etc.) to reduce the volume. Is the irony lost?
SUVs are today's station wagon only better. Many SUVs can haul loads equal to that of some pickups, and still ride like a luxury sedan, though not handle like one. A luxury car,pickup,and station wagon all rolled into one, no wonder it's popular, appealing to the macho as well as the meek.
__________________
Prisoner No. 979




dynodonn is offline