Originally Posted by
Verbose
You're pretty much right on point with how things are set up here. The newer communities (Baldwin Park, for the locals), specifically those built around more of a "village" concept of being all-inclusive, have clearly built their bike lanes and paths from the ground up to mesh well with the city layout. Other areas on the other hand either have no lanes, or the small 3-foot wide "shoulder" style lanes that are essentially just move the white line a few feet over.
Orlando has a fair amount of cyclists in small areas, but very few in relation to population. Finding someone who commutes more than 2-3 miles by bicycle is pretty rare (sans-students) and most cyclists from my experience stick to the trails and away from the street. This is a combination of poorly designed roads, and poorly kept roads.
The "Bike Bus" has been the one progressive thing I've seen in the area in recent years. While it is still relatively new, it is definitely doing a fair job of teaching drivers how to handle encounters with cyclists on non-bike-friendly roads.
Thank you. I was talking with one of the traffic engineers here a short time ago. And he told me that the reason that some of the streets have had bike lanes added to them is because they (the bike lanes) "fit." I'm sorry, but that is one piss poor of a reason to add a bike lane to a road. Just because it "fits" it doesn't follow that it'll be safe to add it to the road in question. And could end up making things worse and more dangerous for cyclists, which as we know does end up happening.